Full text
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 5, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-12332
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00141-MHT-WC-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHAD EDWIN LANGFORD,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
________________________
(April 5, 2012)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Chad Edwin Langford, has filed a
-- 1 of 2 --
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Langford’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
