Yvira Baez v. Potamkin Hyundai, Inc.

11-13568Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 16, 2012

Full text

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEBRUARY 16, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13568
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-21910-FAM
YVIRA BAEZ,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
POTAMKIN HYUNDAI, INC.,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(February 16, 2012)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

The rulings of the District Court in granting the Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment; in denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment; and in dismissing the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint are
affirmed for the reasons set forth in the June 14, 2011 Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, which was adopted by the
District Court on July 11, 2011.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.