The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-13632•USA v. Lakendrick Lashawn Wilson
11-13632Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 12, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 12, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13632
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 7:11-cr-00027-KOB-RRA-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAKENDRICK LASHAWN WILSON,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(January 12, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 11-13632 Date Filed: 01/12/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Lakendrick Lashawn Wilson in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilson’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 11-13632 Date Filed: 01/12/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.