The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-14835•Chris Baker, et al. v. RBS Worldpay, Inc., et al.
11-14835Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 25, 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 25, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-14835
Non-Argument Calendar
D. C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-00307-WS-B
CHRIS BAKER,
RICHARD BATTO,
CHRIS MCMEEKIN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
RBS WORLDPAY, INC.,
ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND, PLC.,
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
(May 25, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment
in favor of defendant-appellees RBS WorldPay, Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland,
PLC, and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and against plaintiff-appellants Chris
Baker, Richard Batto, and Chris McMeekin. Appellants argue that the district
court erred when it granted summary judgment against their claims for breach of
contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment.
This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Levinson v.
Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 245 F.3d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir. 2001).
After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the
district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees based on
the district court’s well-reasoned order filed on October 4, 2011.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.