The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-16081•USA v. Jerome E. Williams
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-16081
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:03-cr-00223-GKS-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEROME E. WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 10, 2013)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Jerome E. Williams in this appeal
from the partial grant of Williams’s motion for a sentence reduction, 18 U.S.C.
Case: 11-16081 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
§ 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s partial grant
of Williams’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
Case: 11-16081 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.