The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-16097•USA v. Bernard Shaw
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 5, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-16097
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:99-cr-00125-KMM-6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BERNARD SHAW, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(July 5, 2012)
Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gail M. Stage, on behalf of Michael Caruso, interim Federal Public
-- 1 of 2 --
Defender and appointed counsel for Bernard Shaw in this appeal from the denial
of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction motion, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of
Shaw’s § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.