USA v. Tiekeron Martin

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-11634
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00187-WS-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIEKERON MARTIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 21, 2013)
Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Tiekeron Martin in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 12-11634 Date Filed: 03/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martin’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
We REMAND for the sole purpose of correcting the judgment to reflect
Martin’s conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. See United States v. Wimbush, 103
F.3d 968, 970 (11th Cir. 1997) (affirming a defendant’s sentence while remanding
for the sole purpose of correcting a typographical error in the judgment).
Case: 12-11634 Date Filed: 03/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --