The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-12678•T. Mark Maclin v. Dr. William Hobbs, et al
12-12678Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 23, 2013
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12678
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 5:10-cv-00137-CLS
T. MARK MACLIN,
as Administrator ad Litem of the
Estate of David Smith,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DR. WILLIAM HOBBS,
J. GALBREATH, RN,
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(May 23, 2013)
Before HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District*
Judge.
Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of*
Florida, sitting by designation.
Case: 12-12678 Date Filed: 05/23/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we conclude that Plaintiff
adduced ample evidence to create genuine issues of fact with respect to both
prongs of Plaintiff’s claim—both the knowledge prong and the deliberate
indifference prong. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and
this case is remanded for trial.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
2
Case: 12-12678 Date Filed: 05/23/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.