USA v. Danny Michael Wilkes

12-13605Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 21, 2013

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-13605
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00011-IPJ-JEO-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY MICHAEL WILKES,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(May 21, 2013)
Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
J. Brice Callaway, appointed counsel for Danny Wilkes in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
Case: 12-13605 Date Filed: 05/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilkes=s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-13605 Date Filed: 05/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.