The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-15169•USA v. Marquise Demetris Jenkins
12-15169Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 9, 2013
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15169
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00031-MCR-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARQUISE DEMETRIS JENKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 9, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Michelle Hendrix, appointed counsel for Marquise Jenkins in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jenkins’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-15169 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.