The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-14801; 13-14802•USA v. Donald Ray Holmes
13-14801; 13-14802Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJul 31, 2014
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14801
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00012-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD RAY HOLMES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
No. 13-14802
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00013-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD RAY HOLMES,
Defendant-Appellant.
Case: 13-14801 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 31, 2014)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Donald Holmes in these direct
criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Holmes
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holmes’s conviction, revocation
of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-14801 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.