USA v. Harold Eugene Young

14-10939Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOct 7, 2014

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10939
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00021-MW-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HAROLD EUGENE YOUNG,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 7, 2014)
Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10939 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Harold Young, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Young’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-10939 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.