USA v. Brian K. Hatten

14-11531Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 18, 2014

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11531
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00264-JA-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN K. HATTEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 18, 2014)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11531 Date Filed: 11/18/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Brian Hatten, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Hatten’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-11531 Date Filed: 11/18/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.