USA v. Thomas W. Faircloth

14-14899Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 12, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14899
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00013-WLS-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS W. FAIRCLOTH,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(May 12, 2016)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Thomas Faircloth in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 14-14899 Date Filed: 05/12/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Faircloth’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-14899 Date Filed: 05/12/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.