USA v. Vincent Hudson

14-15480Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 7, 2015

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15480
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00078-PGB-TBS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VINCENT HUDSON,
a.k.a. Goldie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 7, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15480 Date Filed: 12/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Thomas Dale, appointed appellate counsel for Vincent Hudson, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hudson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-15480 Date Filed: 12/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.