Stan Motley v. Fulton County, Georgia, et al

15-11628Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 16, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11628
Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-03196-SCJ
STAN MOTLEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(March 16, 2016)
Before JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and KALLON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
* The Honorable Abdul K. Kallon, United States District Judge for the Northern District
of Alabama, sitting by designation.
Case: 15-11628 Date Filed: 03/16/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Following a review of the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we
affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment. This is one of those rare
cases where, despite the existence of a prima facie case and sufficient evidence of
pretext, no rational jury could conclude that the termination was discriminatory.
See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Product, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 148 (2000);
Flowers v. Troup County, 803 F.3d 1327, 1339 (11th Cir. 2015); Schnabel v.
Abramson, 232 F.3d 83, 90-91 (2d Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-11628 Date Filed: 03/16/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.