USA v. Jonathan Tyler Prive

15-12032Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 24, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12032
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00033-JA-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN TYLER PRIVE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 24, 2016)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12032 Date Filed: 05/24/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Daniel Brodersen, appointed counsel for Jonathan Prive in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prive’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED. Additionally, Prive’s motion for appointment of new
counsel is DENIED.
Case: 15-12032 Date Filed: 05/24/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.