USA v. Ramiro Antunez-Pineda

15-12110Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 11, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12110
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00272-WSD-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMIRO ANTUNEZ-PINEDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(January 11, 2016)
Before HULL, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12110 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Colette Resnik Steel, appointed counsel for Ramiro Antunez-Pineda, in this
direct criminal appeal, as moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Antunez-Pineda’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-12110 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.