USA v. Thomas Jason Strickland

15-12734Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 18, 2015

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12734
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-B-8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JASON STRICKLAND,
a.k.a. J-Red,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(December 18, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12734 Date Filed: 12/18/2015 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Thomas Jason Strickland pled guilty to
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21
U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). The plea agreement contained a cooperation
provision to be applied under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, Substantial Assistance to
Authorities, and/or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), Reducing a
Sentence for Substantial Assistance.1 Doc. 108 at 6-11. Paragraph 21, subsection
g. of the agreement states that “[i]f the defendant’s efforts to cooperate with the
United States does not amount to substantial assistance as determined solely by the
United States, the United States agrees to recommend that the defendant receive a
sentence at the low end of the advisory guideline range.” Doc. 108 at 9.
At sentencing, the District Court determined that the applicable sentence
range under the Sentencing Guidelines called for a prison sentence of 100 to 125
months based on a total offense level of 27 and a criminal history category of IV.
The minimum prison term the court could impose, however, was 120 months, see
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), because the conspiracy offense involved “at least
50 grams of methamphetamine.” Id. at 14. Therefore, under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1, the
Guidelines sentence range became 120-125 months.2 The Government, pursuant
to paragraph 21, g. of the plea agreement, recommended a sentence at the low end
1 Rule 35(b) is inapplicable here. It authorizes the Government to move for a reduction
of a sentence after its imposition.
2 U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(c) states, in pertinent part: “[T]he sentence may be imposed at any
point within the applicable guideline range, provided that the sentence . . . (2) is not less than any
statutorily required minimum sentence.
Case: 15-12734 Date Filed: 12/18/2015 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

3
of the range, 120 months. Strickland argued that under the plea agreement, the
Government had to recommend a sentence of 100 months. The District Court
disagreed and sentenced Strickland to a prison term of 120 months.
Strickland appeals his sentence, arguing that the Government breached the
plea agreement by recommending a sentence of 120 months. We disagree.
U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 allows the Government to move the District Court to
depart from the Guidelines sentence range. Had the Government recommended a
sentence of 100 months, the court could not have imposed it due to the statutory
mandatory minimum of 120 months.3
AFFIRMED.
3 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) authorizes the Government to move the district court to impose a
sentence below the statutory minimum. Strickland’s plea agreement did not call for the
Government to file such a motion. In essence, Strickland wrongly contends that the Government
should have filed a § 3553(e) motion.
Case: 15-12734 Date Filed: 12/18/2015 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.