The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-12965•USA v. Mark Edward Rowley
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12965
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00242-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK EDWARD ROWLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(June 7, 2016)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Hughes, appointed counsel for Mark Rowley in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 15-12965 Date Filed: 06/07/2016 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.
Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Rowley’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-12965 Date Filed: 06/07/2016 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.