USA v. Jaquan Arkeem Hale

15-13808Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 16, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13808
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00304-CG-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAQUAN ARKEEM HALE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(May 16, 2016)
Before JORDAN, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-13808 Date Filed: 05/16/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Jaquan Arkeem Hale, in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.
Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hale’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-13808 Date Filed: 05/16/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.