The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-10140•USA v. Thomas Jerome Lundy
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10140
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JEROME LUNDY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 31, 2016)
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.