The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-10269•USA v. Robert Beneby
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10269
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Number 1:13-cr-20577-MGC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT BENEBY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(January 6, 2017)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Moss, Jr., appointed counsel for Robert Beneby in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record, including Beneby’s response to
Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
counsel’s motion, reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and
Beneby’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-10269 Date Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.