USA v. Cedric R. Monroe

16-10944Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 27, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10944
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00390-RAL-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIC R. MONROE,
a.k.a. Ced,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 27, 2017)
Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Cedric R. Monroe in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Monroe’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.