The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-11018•USA v. Alex Negrete
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11018
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20651-WJZ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALEX NEGRETE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(December 16, 2016)
Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for Alex Negrete in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 16-11018 Date Filed: 12/16/2016 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Negrete’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-11018 Date Filed: 12/16/2016 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.