The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-11615•USA v. Corey Lemar Wright
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11615
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-21031-PCH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
COREY LEMAR WRIGHT,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(November 10, 2016)
Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-11615 Date Filed: 11/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Corey Lemar Wright appeals pro se the denial of his third motion to reduce
his sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Wright moved for a reduction based on
Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.
The district court did not err by denying Wright’s motion. Wright pleaded
guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, see 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1), (a)(2), and the district court sentenced him to five years of
imprisonment. Because Wright’s sentence was based on the statutory mandatory
minimum, see United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.1(b), not on the
drug quantity tables, see id. § 2D1.1, he was ineligible for a reduction of his
sentence under Amendment 782, see id. § 1B1.10 cmt n.1(A). The district court
lacked authority to reduce Wright’s sentence.
We AFFIRM the denial of Wright’s motion to reduce.
Case: 16-11615 Date Filed: 11/10/2016 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.