USA v. Justin Holifield

16-16375Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 30, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-16375
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00087-UA-MRM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUSTIN HOLIFIELD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 30, 2017)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-16375 Date Filed: 03/30/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Justin Holifield in this direct
criminal appeal from the revocation of his supervised release, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Holifield’s
revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-16375 Date Filed: 03/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.