USA v. Michael Bernard Johnson

17-10007Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOct 20, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10007
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00028-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL BERNARD JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 20, 2017)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Brandon N. Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Bernard Johnson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr.
Johnson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Although the brief does not satisfy the requirements of an Anders brief, see,
e.g., United States v. Edwards, 822 F.2d 1012, 1013 (11 th Cir. 1987), our
independent and plenary review of the entire record reveals that Mr. Fleming’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Mr. Fleming’s
motion to withdraw is G RANTED, and Mr. Johnson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 17-10007 Date Filed: 10/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.