USA v. Edwin Hernandez

17-10880Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOct 3, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10880
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00409-VMC-JSS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWIN HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 3, 2017)
Before HULL, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 17-10880 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Edwin Hernandez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 17-10880 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.