The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-14327•USA v. Sophia Quill
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14327
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:19-cr-00028-MW-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SOPHIA QUILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 21, 2020)
Case: 19-14327 Date Filed: 08/21/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2
Before WILSON, BRANCH, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Robert Ufferman, counsel for Sophia Quill in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Quill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 19-14327 Date Filed: 08/21/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.