The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-10005•USA v. Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr.
20-10005Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitSep 11, 2020
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10005
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00045-JDW-PRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FREDERICK MICHAEL POHL, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 11, 2020)
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2
Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr., in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Pohl’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.