The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-10233•USA v. Ramon Francisco Castillo
20-10233Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 26, 2020
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10233
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00175-RBD-LRH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMON FRANCISCO CASTILLO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 26, 2020)
Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10233 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2
Ryan Thomas Truskoski, counsel for Ramon Francisco Castillo in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Castillo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 20-10233 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.