The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-10662•USA v. Trabian Jones
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10662
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-00027-LAG-TQL-12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRABIAN JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(June 30, 2020)
Before GRANT, LUCK and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10662 Date Filed: 06/30/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2
Richard Greenberg, counsel for Trabian Jones in this direct criminal appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Jones’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 20-10662 Date Filed: 06/30/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.