The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-12317•USA v. Stephannie N. Macnew
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-12317
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:19-cr-00089-TKW-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEPHANNIE N. MACNEW,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(March 3, 2021)
Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-12317 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Sheryl Lowenthal, counsel for Stephannie MacNew in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and MacNew’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-12317 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.