The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-13062•USA v. Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra
20-13062Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 5, 2021
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-13062
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00609-VMC-CPT-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SILVIO SEGUNDO MICOLTA-SINISTERRA,
a.k.a. Silvio Luna,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 5, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before NEWSOM, GRANT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Silvio Segundo Micolta-Sinisterra
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation
of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Micolta-Sinisterra’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-13062 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.