The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-13397•USA v. Julian J. Rogers
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-13397
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00260-KD-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JULIAN J. ROGERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(March 17, 2021)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Julian Rogers in this direct
USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Rogers’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.