The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-10359•USA v. Brian James Hulse
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 21-10359
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN HULSE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(August 2, 2021)
Before NEWSOM, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this revocation of
supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-10359 Date Filed: 08/02/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.