The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-12296•USA v. James Gordon Hill
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-12296
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES GORDON HILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:07-cr-00275-TJC-MCR-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12296 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 21-12296
Before J ORDAN, NEWSOM , and EDMONDSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for James Gordon Hill in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to
An-
ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hill’s supervised release
revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-12296 Document: 40-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.