Eugene Misquith v. Roberto Borrego, et al.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11194
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
EUGENE MISQUITH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ROBERTO BORREGO,
ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER,
PALM BEACH TRAUMA ASSOCIATES,
PALM BEACH COUNTY HEALTHCARE
DISTRICT,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11194 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11194
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 9:20-cv-81123-AMC
____________________
Before W ILSON, ROSENBAUM , and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Misquith appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
second amended complaint against Palm Beach County Health
Care District (“the district”), St. Mary’s Medical Center (“St.
Mary’s”), Robert Borrego, and Palm Beach Trauma Associates
(“PBTA”) (collectively, “the healthcare providers”), alleging disa-
bility discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Dis-
abilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112, 12203(a), race, national
origin, age, and disability discrimination and retaliation under the
Florida Civil Rights Act (“FRCA”), Fla. Stat. § 760.10, and retalia-
tion under the Florida Whistleblower Act (“FWA”), Fla. Stat. §
448.102. He argues that the district court improperly dismissed the
90-page second amended complaint as a shotgun pleading and for
failure to state a claim.
After reviewing the briefs and the record, we find no error,
and we affirm the dismissal of Misquith’s second amended com-
plaint for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned
report and recommendation.
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11194 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 02/22/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --