USA v. Andrew Bravo Jimenez

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11379
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANDREW BRAVO JIMENEZ,
a.k.a. DROOPY,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00045-CAR-CHW-4
USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11379
____________________
Before J ILL PRYOR , NEWSOM , and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John Jay McArthur, appointed counsel for Andrew
Bravo-Jimenez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with-
draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ-
ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jimenez’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --