The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-14028•USA v. Scott P. Haines
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-14028
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SCOTT P. HAINES,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cr-00004-MCR-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-14028 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-14028
Before N EWSOM , G RANT, and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Sheehan, counsel for Scott Haines in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. Califor-
nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Haines’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-14028 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.