USA v. Matthias Jacob Edward Mann

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-10277
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MATTHIAS JACOB EDWARD MANN,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00010-LCB-HNJ-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10277 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10277
Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM, and L AGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Bradford, appointed counsel for Matthias Mann in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Mann has filed a pro se response in which he re-
quests the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, Mann’s motion for the appointment of
new counsel is DENIED, and Mann’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 23-10277 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --