The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-13705•William Jackson v. Doris Jackson
23-13705Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 4, 2024
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-13705
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
WILLIAM JACKSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DORIS CHAPPELL JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-04174-ELR
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13705 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/04/2024 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 23-13705
Before J ORDAN, JILL PRYOR , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. William Jackson, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district
court’s order remanding to state court a divorce action. We lack
jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on
the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports &Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96
(11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Hu-
mana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 23-13705 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.