Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company, Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (doing Business As Mazda North…

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RYDEX, LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
(DOING BUSINESS AS MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN
OPERATIONS),
Defendants-Cross Appellants
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.,
Defendant-Cross Appellant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant-Cross Appellant
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants
______________________
2013-1462, 2013-1463
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0122, Judge
Vanessa D. Gilmore.

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
STAMATIOS STAMOULIS , Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC,
Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
D OMINIC F RANCIS P ERELLA , Hogan Lovells US LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellants.
Also represented by JASON R. M UDD, Erise IP, P.A., Over-
land Park, KS. J EFFREY SCOTT P ATTERSON, Hartline
Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-cross
appellant Nissan North America, Inc. ERIC W.
SCHWEIBENZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neu-
stadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff-cross appellant
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by
RICHARD D. K ELLY , ROBERT CARTER MATTSON.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and
O’MALLEY , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --