Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC., doing business as Now Foods

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC.,
doing business as Now Foods,
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SOFT GEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant,
v.
JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.
______________________
2014-1020, -1033, -1039
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in Nos. 2:10-cv-08301-PSG-
JC and 2:11-cv-00164-PSG-JC, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

MARK D. G IARRATANA and T HOMAS J. RECHEN,
McCarter & English, LLP, of Hartford, Connecticut,
argued for Jarrow Formulas, Inc. With them on the brief
were ERIC E. G RONDAHL and CHARLES D. RAY .
S RI K. SANKARAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellants, Soft
Gel Technologies, Inc. With him on the brief for Soft Gel
was D EVAN V. P ADMANABHAN. On the brief for Now
Health Group, Inc., were R. D AVID D ONOGHUE and STEVEN
E. J EDLINSKI, Holland & Knight LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (WALLACH , CHEN, and HUGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED.1 See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
1 Accordingly, the Motion to Strike filed by Jarrow
Formulas, Inc. (ECF No. 57) is DENIED as moot.

-- 2 of 2 --