Bayer Cropscience Ag and Bayer S.a.s. v. Dow Agrosciences LLC

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG AND BAYER S.A.S.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2014-1032
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00256-RMB-JS, Judge
Renee Marie Bumb.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHRISTOPHER J. G ASPAR , Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plain-
tiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT J.
K OCH , STEPHANIE R. AMOROSO, E DWARD J. MAYLE and
RONALD L. SIGWORTH , of Washington, DC. Of counsel on
the brief were BRADFORD J. BADKE and SONA D E, Ropes &
Gray LLP, of New York, New York.
MARK S. D AVIES , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP,
of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With

-- 1 of 2 --

him on the brief were SUSANNAH L ANDES WEAVER ; and
P ETER A. BICKS , ALEX V. CHACHKES and ANDREW D.
SILVERMAN, of New York, New York.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, P LAGER , and HUGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --