The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1056•Alexander S. Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
15-1056Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 15, 2015
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,
Plaintiff
v.
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee
v.
DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON,
Sanctioned Parties-Appellants
______________________
2015-1056
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida in No. 0:02-cv-60478-WJZ,
Judge William J. Zloch.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D AVID F INK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for
appellants.
T IMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, Goodwin Procter LLP, New
York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by
-- 1 of 2 --
D OUGLAS J. K LINE, Boston, MA; WILLIAM M. J AY , Wash-
ington, DC.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, L OURIE and L INN,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.