Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INOVA LABS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
INOGEN, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1067
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,885.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
ERIC B. MEYERTONS , Meyertons, Hood, Kivlin, Kowert
& Goetzel, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant.
J OHN B. SGANGA, J R., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear,
LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by
L INDA H. L IU, N ICHOLAS M. ZOVKO.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (O’MALLEY , P LAGER , and T ARANTO, Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 7, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
