VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC,… v. Sidekick Technology, LLC

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
VROOM, INC., VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, dba
Vroom, dba Texas Direct Auto, CARSTORY, LLC,
VAST.COM, INC., dba CarStory,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.
SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
Defendant-Appellant
______________________
2023-1362, 2023-1667, 2023-2041
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey in No. 2:21-cv-06737-WJM-JSA,
Senior Judge William J. Martini.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before STOLL, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit
Judges.
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
O R D E R
The parties filed a motion to stay these appeals while
they worked to effectuate settlement and asked the district
Case: 23-1362 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 01/28/2026

-- 1 of 2 --

VROOM, INC. v. SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC 2
court for an indicative ruling that it would vacate its prior
patent-ineligibility decisions if this court remanded. ECF
No. 57. Now that the district court has so indicated, the
parties jointly move to remand these appeals for it to do so.
ECF No. 60.1
We remand for the limited purpose of the district
court’s consideration of the parties’ request for vacatur.
See Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Thermo-Ply, Inc., 629 F.3d
1374, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2011). In granting the motion, this
court takes no position on the propriety or necessity of any
vacatur, leaving it to the district court to consider the prin-
ciples enunciated in United States Bancorp Mortgage Co. v.
Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 29 (1994).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) ECF No. 60 is granted to the extent that the ap-
peals are remanded.
(2) ECF No. 57 is denied as moot.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
January 28, 2026
Date
FOR THE COURT
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 28, 2026
1 The motion to remand, ECF No. 60, supersedes a
prior version of the motion docketed as ECF No. 58. No
action will be taken on ECF No. 58.
Case: 23-1362 Document: 61 Page: 2 Filed: 01/28/2026

-- 2 of 2 --