Medivis, Inc. v. Novarad Corp.

24-1951Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 10, 2025

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MEDIVIS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
NOVARAD CORP.,
Appellee
______________________
2024-1951
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-
00045.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
ADAM STEINMETZ, Desmarais LLP, Washington, DC,
argued for appellant. Also represented by BETTY H. CHEN,
San Francisco, CA; T AEG SANG CHO, J OHN M. D ESMARAIS ,
New York, NY.
J OSEPH HARMER , Thorpe North & Western, LLP, Salt
Lake City, UT, argued for appellee. Also represented by
J ED H. HANSEN.
______________________
Case: 24-1951 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2025

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , CLEVENGER , and T ARANTO, Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2025
Date
Case: 24-1951 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2025

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.